By Muhammad Samir Khan
In any democratic society, governance is not a one-sided affair where the state governs and citizens merely comply. Rather, it is a two-way street that thrives on active civic engagement. Yet, in Pakistan, a majority of the population remains unaware of their civic responsibilities and rights—allowing governance structures to operate without meaningful public accountability.
Civic engagement refers to the participation of citizens in the political, social, and economic processes that shape their communities and the country at large. It includes everything from voting and public consultations to community organizing, policy advocacy, and holding public officials accountable. Unfortunately, our political culture often reduces citizen participation to casting a vote every few years—if that.
This limited engagement breeds weak governance. When citizens do not demand transparency, question decisions, or offer constructive feedback, public institutions stagnate. Corruption, inefficiency, and elite capture flourish in this vacuum. On the other hand, where citizens actively monitor public services, question budgets, and participate in local development plans, governance becomes more transparent, responsive, and equitable.
Pakistan’s recent history shows the power of civic engagement—from the lawyers’ movement that restored the judiciary to youth-led campaigns pushing for electoral reforms. However, such engagement remains episodic rather than systemic. One key reason is the absence of civic education in our schools and public discourse. Citizens are seldom taught how local governments work, what public forums exist for grievances, or how to file a Right to Information (RTI) request.
Local governance structures—meant to be the closest interface between the citizen and the state—are also undermined by political neglect. Elections for local bodies are delayed, and when held, the elected representatives lack the funds or authority to act. This disempowerment of grassroots democracy dissuades citizen involvement and centralizes power in faraway bureaucracies.
To bridge the governance gap, we must normalize civic participation in daily life. Universities, civil society organizations, and media must take the lead in educating and mobilizing citizens. Youth, in particular, should be empowered to take ownership of their neighborhoods—be it through climate action, anti-corruption initiatives, or digital activism.
Most importantly, the state must open up spaces for public input in policymaking. Town hall meetings, citizen juries, participatory budgeting, and digital complaint systems are not utopian ideas—they are being successfully practiced in other democracies and can be localized for Pakistan.
Democracy does not end with elections. It begins there. A vigilant and engaged citizenry is the best safeguard against misgovernance. As we look to rebuild public trust in institutions, the time has come to move beyond slogans and create meaningful platforms for civic engagement. Only then can we transition from being passive subjects to active citizens, capable of shaping a just, accountable, and democratic Pakistan.
