NEW YORK: The tragedy of Kashmir, which worsened after the unilateral illegal action of August 5, 2019, by the Modi regime in India has become a threat to world peace as it involves two nuclear nations.
This was stated by Pakistan’s permanent representative to the UN Munir Akram while speaking at an event held at Pakistan Permanent Mission at the UN.
The event was titled “Challenges in the realization of the right of self-determination in the contemporary global context”.
Ambassador Munir Akram said the right of determination is bedrock of the modern international system. It is a fundamental principle of the UN Charter.
However, the right of self will not be fully fulfilled until all peoples who are under foreign occupation or settler-colonialism are able to exercise the right of self-determination. And there are still examples of where peoples continue to be denied the right of self-determination.
Currently, we can see two situations at least, where the right of self-determination is being flagrantly denied. One is Palestine and the second is Jammu and Kashmir. The past four months have illustrated the consequences of the suppression of the right of self-determination to the Palestinian people. 27,000 and counting have been killed; mostly women and children.
A war, which has been called by the ICJ as plausible genocide, is continuing and despite the decisions of the General Assembly, the near unanimity in the Security Council and the support of the international community in public opinion, the acceptance of a ceasefire still eludes the international community.
Promises have been made as we have heard in recent days to revive the Middle East peace process with offers to finally accept the establishment of a Palestinian state, but the path towards this goal still lacks credibility.
The Israeli Prime Minister has summarily rejected the two-state solution. He will not even agree to a halt in what has been called the plausible genocide campaign in Gaza. We admire South Africa’s reference to the ICJ and we commend Algeria’s initiative in the Security Council to get a ceasefire.
The Court’s preliminary prescriptions are important and binding regardless of whether or not these are endorsed by the Security Council. Under the Charter, they are binding. To secure a two-state solution the Arab and the Islamic countries in particular must fully mobilize their diplomatic, political, economic and other powers.
The ambassador said denial of self-determination to the people of Jammu and Kashmir also deserves the full attention of the international community. There are massive violations of human rights taking place there and the dispute over Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan is an ever-present threat of international peace and security.
A threat of a conflict which has happened in the past, but which can happen again. A conflict between two nuclear armed states and that is a sobering thought or should be a sobering thought for the international community.
On February 8, the people of Jammu and Kashmir and the people of Pakistan observed Kashmir Solidarity Day. On this day in 1989, over 100 innocent Kashmiris demonstrated peacefully for their right to self-determination as recognized and promised to them by the Security Council in several resolutions. These peaceful demonstrators were shot at and hundreds of them were killed.
In the decade since the freedom struggle which this incident unleashed, over 100,000 Kashmiris were killed. We said 27,000 Palestinians killed in this war in this decade and 100,000 Kashmiris were martyred including men, women and children. This is recorded in two reports of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights issued in 2017 and 2018.
The Kashmir tragedy has intensified after the unilateral measures taken on 5th August, 2019, and since then, to remove the statehood of Jammu and Kashmir, impose a siege with 90,000 troops unleashed a brutal crackdown with extra judicial killings, collective punishment, the abduction of 15,000 Kashmiri youth and simultaneously, an effort to change the demographic structure and composition of the occupied territory in direct contravention of the resolutions of the Security Council.
Despite this brutal suppression and the attempts to portray a false sense of normalcy by holding G-20 meetings on tourism in the territory, the resort to what has been ominously called “a final solution” despite the guns, despite the killing, despite the coercion, the information blackout, sophisticated disinformation, despite all of this the Kashmiri people have not relented in their desire for freedom and self-determination.
With regards to both the situations in Palestine and Kashmir, and I suspect elsewhere, where peoples are oppressed and occupied, a lesson of history has been that a colonial power has never succeeded in suppressing the right of self-determination of people who are determined to sacrifice all for their freedom and liberation from foreign occupation.
And this is a lesson I think, that everyone should bear in mind as they address the current situations, as in Palestine and in Jammu and Kashmir.
We are confident that the Palestinians, the Kashmiris and other oppressed people will ultimately secure their right to self-determination and freedom as most of us have done through the process of decolonization.
When seeking self-determination for the Palestinian, the Kashmiris and other occupied peoples, what has to be borne in mind is that the acceptance of this right by a former colonial power or an occupation power is not a favor to the people being liberated. It is an obligation under colonial and occupying power to give that right of self-determination and liberation to the occupied people.
Secondly, the realization of the right of self-determination has been prevented by support of occupying powers from powerful states; this is again the lesson of history. Occupying powers by themselves cannot sustain their occupation unless they have support from powerful states externally.
And thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, situations of foreign occupation and denial of self-determination are most pervasive or the most pervasive cause of conflict, whether internal conflict or international conflict. And this should be a sobering thought for the membership of the United Nations.
Comments are closed.