CALIFORNIA: Meta Platforms has patented an innovative AI model that would allow social media accounts to continue posting, chatting, and interacting with others even after the user has passed away.
This cutting-edge technology, which was approved in December 2025, could transform the way we think about digital presence and the afterlife, but also raises complex ethical and emotional questions.
The AI system, based on a large language model (LLM), is designed to replicate a user’s writing style, tone, and interactions. It can use data collected during a user’s life such as their posts, preferences, and communication habits to create posts, comments, or even audio and video content that mimic the deceased individual’s voice and mannerisms. In essence, it would allow a person to live on digitally, engaging with others online as if they were still alive.
Meta’s spokesperson clarified that while the patent has been granted, the company does not have immediate plans to deploy this technology. However, the potential for a “digital afterlife” has sparked widespread interest and debate. While some may see this as a way to keep the memory of loved ones alive, others view it as an unsettling step toward “digital immortality” that could blur the line between reality and artificial representation.
The concept of AI-powered posts after death has been met with mixed reactions. Critics argue that this technology could create “digital ghosts” or “grief robots,” where users continue to “exist” online, potentially leading to an unnatural and prolonged mourning process. Some social media users voiced their concerns on platforms like Twitter, expressing discomfort with the idea of their deceased loved ones being “replaced” by AI-generated content. One user tweeted, “Meta has patented an AI to take control of dead people’s accounts. Is there no line left for them to cross?”
While the technology could offer new ways to memorialize people, it also raises significant ethical dilemmas. What happens to the deceased person’s digital identity, and who decides how it is used? Is it ethical to keep a digital version of someone alive without their consent, especially if they did not explicitly agree to such a posthumous digital existence?
Experts are also questioning the broader implications of this technology for privacy and consent. Could this lead to a situation where people’s digital lives are managed and even monetized after their death without their approval? Would it be fair to allow a “virtual version” of someone to continue engaging with their friends and family, potentially without any real agency?
Despite the controversy, this patent reveals a growing trend toward the intersection of artificial intelligence, digital legacy, and memory. In a world increasingly governed by online interactions, the idea of continuing to interact with loved ones through AI after their death might not be as far-fetched as it once seemed. Whether society is ready for this new reality remains to be seen, but it’s clear that as technology advances, the digital afterlife may soon be something we’ll have to confront.
For now, Meta has indicated that this patent is more of an exploration into future possibilities than an immediate product rollout. However, as these technologies continue to evolve, the questions surrounding death, memory, and artificial intelligence will only grow more complex.
